AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Sven game online3/8/2024 ![]() Workers were seen as engaging in crude, bawdy behaviour and in highly suspicious games of chance, rather than in the one kind of game that would be beneficial to them: namely, organized sports. ![]() Play and games had to be educational and constructive, readying boys and girls for their later respective roles, necessitating clearly distinct toys for each gender.īourgeois moralists saw the less segregated sphere of the child among the working classes, on the other hand, as a dangerous admixture. footnote 2 Its only function was as preparation for adulthood. When the 19th-century German educator Friedrich Fröbel stated that ‘play at this time is not trivial, it is highly serious and of deep significance’, the implication was that at other times-in life after childhood-it is indeed trivial. Ernst Haeckel’s famous 1866 law, ‘ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny’, was but one manifestation of a tendency in that period to construct parallels between the lives of individuals and those of the species to relegate play and games to the sphere of the child was perhaps also to suggest a parallel in human history, to associate them with an earlier stage in the development of civilization. The 19th-century bourgeoisie, for example, relegated play to the past by identifying it almost exclusively with children, in a sphere increasingly separated from ‘proper’ social life. ![]() footnote 1 Associated with either the past or a possible future, it often appeared as an anachronism. I n modern culture, the element of play has long constituted a problem. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |